|
ENDNOTES
1Surveys (BSS 2003) for this population included at most only 3 out of the 5 questions prescribed by UNAIDS for this indicator. The 2005 IHBSS has been conducted. However, official results have not yet been released as of submission of this Country Report. In the 2005 IHBSS round, only 3 out of the 5 questions prescribed by UNAIDS have been asked, plus 4 new questions were included to measure knowledge about HIV prevention.
2Surveys (BSS 2003) for this population included at most only 3 out of the 5 questions prescribed by UNAIDS for this indicator. The 2005 IHBSS has been conducted. However, official results have not yet been released as of submission of this Country Report. In the 2005 IHBSS round, only 3 out of the 5 questions prescribed by UNAIDS have been asked, plus 4 new questions were included to measure knowledge about HIV prevention.
3Surveys (BSS 2003) for this population included only at most 3 out of the 5 questions prescribed by UNAIDS for this indicator. The 2005 IHBSS for IDU has not yet been conducted as of submission of this Country Report.
4Only males 15-24 year olds were asked this question in the 2002 YAFS. Overall, six questions were asked related to this.
5Data available is for 2003 only. According to the LEAD Project, 4,000+ samples coming from nine (9) sentinel sites have been completed in 2005. However, official results have not yet been released by NEC as of the time of submission of this Country Report.
62003 HIV Serologic Surveillance (as reported in the 2003 National Epidemiology Center (NEC) Technical Report).
7Percentages were computed based on BSS sample size of 300 PIP tested for HIV per sentinel site x 10 sentinel sites = 3,000 PIP tested for HIV. Official estimates for population size of PIP are still not available. However, the 2002 Consensus Report on STI, HIV and AIDS Epidemiology placed the population size at 540,000 for 2001.
82003 HIV Serologic Surveillance (as reported by the National Epidemiology Center (NEC)).
9Percentages were computed based on BSS sample size of 300 MSM tested for HIV per sentinel site x 10 sentinel sites = 3,000 MSM tested for HIV. Official estimates for population size of MSM are still not available.
10No percentages were computed due to absence of official estimate for population size of IDU. However, the 2002 Consensus Report on STI, HIV and AIDS Epidemiology placed the population size at 10,000 in 2001.
11No percentages were computed due to absence of official estimate for population size of OFW.
12Available data from the HIV/AIDS registry as of September 2005 is for 10-19 and 20-29 year old. Not in percentage but in actual numbers. Figures provided are cumulative from 1987 to September 2005. There were 13 males aged 10-19 years old and 334 males aged 20-29 years old documented to have HIV. There were 31 females aged 10-19 and 365 females aged 20-29. Overall, the totals are 44 cases for age 10-19 and 699 for ages 20-29.
13HIV/AIDS Country Profile PHILIPPINES 2002, p. 9
142002 Consensus Report on STI, HIV and AIDS Epidemiology. World Health Organization and Department of Health, Philippines 2002, pp. 23-24.
15HIV/AIDS Country Profile PHILIPPINES 2002, p.2
162002 Consensus Report on STI, HIV and AIDS Epidemiology. World Health Organization and Department of Health, Philippines 2002, p. 24
172003 NEC Technical Report, p.4.
18AMTP III, pp. 2-4
19AMTP IV, Foreword by the Department of Health Secretary
202002 Consensus Report on STI, HIV and AIDS Epidemiology. World Health Organization and Department of Health, Philippines 2002, p. 22
21AMTP III, p. 14
22Loc. Cit. p. 7-8
23AMTP IV, p. 3
24AMTP IV, p. 17
252002 HIV/AIDS Country Profile PHILIPPINES, p. 8
262003 NEC Technical Report, p. 8
27AMTP III, page 5.
282002 HIV/AIDS Country Profile PHILIPPINES , p.2
29Ibid.
30Guidelines on Construction of Core Indicators for the 2006 Report to the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS 2006 Report)
31Ibid.
32The Consensus Report on STI, HIV and AIDS Epidemiology in 2002 placed the PIP population size at 540,000 for 2001. No new official estimates, however, were obtained for 2003, 2004 and 2005 as of writing of this Country Report.
33Data is for female freelance sex workers coming from seven (7) sentinel sites. Cumulative LEAD HIV/AIDS SIOs Numerical Report for the period February to September 2005. Also from Size Estimation Workshop held on September 12-15, 2005, Cebu City.
34Cumulative LEAD HIV/AIDS SIOs Numerical Report for the period February to September 2005. Also from Size Estimation Workshop held on September 12-15, 2005, Cebu City.
35Cumulative LEAD HIV/AIDS SIOs Numerical Report for the period February to September 2005. Also from Size Estimation Workshop held on September 12-15, 2005, Cebu City.
36The 2002 Consensus Report on STI, HIV and AIDS Epidemiology placed the PIP population size at 540,000 for 2001.
37Cumulative LEAD HIV/AIDS SIOs Numerical Report for the period February to September 2005. Also from Size Estimation Workshop held on September 12-15, 2005, Cebu City.
38Cumulative LEAD HIV/AIDS SIOs Numerical Report for the period February to September 2005. Also from Size Estimation Workshop held on September 12-15, 2005, Cebu City.
39The 2002 Consensus Report on STI, HIV and AIDS Epidemiology in 2002 placed the IDU population size at 10,000 in that year.
40Cumulative LEAD HIV/AIDS SIOs Numerical Report for the period February to September 2005. Also from Size Estimation Workshop held on September 12-15, 2005, Cebu City.
412003 NEC Technical Report. Survey included three questions regarding major misconceptions.
422005 IHBSS; Data supplied by LEAD Project
43Ibid.
44Surveys (2002 YAFS) for this population included only 4 out of the 5 questions prescribed by UNAIDS for this indicator. No combined total percentages for the four questions provided.
452003 NEC Technical Report, p. 18
46Ibid.
47Ibid.
482005 IHBSS; Data supplied by LEAD Project
492003 NEC Technical Report, p.4.
|