Accomplishment Reports Making a Difference
Philippines HIV and AIDS Timeline and RAF
HIV AIDS and the Development Context
Development Indicators
Health Indicators
Family Planning and Maternal & Child Health

Development Indicators

Table 1: Key Development Indicators
Indicators Values Year
Estimated Population Size 85.5 million 2005
Population Size 76,498,735 2000
Population Growth Rate 2.11% 2000-2005
Human Development Index (HDI), HDI Rank 0.753 2002
Gender Development Index (GDI), GDI Rank 0.751, 66th 2002
GDP per Capita (US$) 1,025.98 2004
NG Tax Revenue/ GDP 12.34% 2004
Investment/GNP 15.89% 2004
Total Outstanding NG Debt/GDP 76.99% 2004
Public Debt (% of GDP) 101% 2003
External Debt (% of GNP) 61.9% 2004
Social Sector Expenditures (as % of total Expenditure) 42.81% 2003
Share of poorest quintile in income or consumption 4.7% 2003
Share of richest quintile in income or consumption 53.3 2003
Life Expectancy at Birth (in Years)    
    Male 67.2 2003
    Female 72.5 2003
Unemployment rate 10.9% 2004
Underemployment rate 16.9% 2004
Poverty headcounts ratio (% of families below national poverty line; preliminary) 24.7% 2003
Percent of population with access to safe water supply 80% 2002
Proportion of underweight children (0-5 years old) 32% 2003

Population

The Philippines has an estimated population of 85.5 million. Growing annually at 2.11 percent, the population is projected to reach 102.8 million by 2015. As of the 2000 census, the country had a population density of 255 persons per square kilometer. Sixty percent of the population lives in urban areas (UNFPA, 2001), with a third of the total population living in the National Capital Region (NCR) and the adjacent Southern Tagalog Region. The NCR is the country's most densely populated region, with an average density of 16,091 persons per square kilometer.

Rapid population growth puts stress on the country's economic resources, slowing down economic growth and development. This negatively affects the delivery of social and health services, including those that directly affect HIV and AIDS prevention and care. Moreover, people often fail to see that rapid population growth has contributed to widespread unemployment in the Philippines, forcing many Filipinos to work overseas, where they often face risks for HIV.

Income, Poverty and Employment

On average, Filipino households have an annual income of PhP 148,616, or less than US$ 3,000. According to the 2003 Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), 24.7 percent of Filipino families are poor. Using the World Bank international poverty line of US$1 per day, there is a slight decrease in the proportion of the population living below the poverty line (11.1 percent in 2003 compared with 13.5 percent in 2000; MDG).

Table 2: Average Annual Family Income 2003
    Income in Pesos
Philippines   148,616
NCR National Capital Region 274,529
CAR Cordillera Autonomous Region 157,045
Region 1 Ilocos Region 102,596
Region 2 Cagayan Valley 97,945
Region 3 Central Luzon 136,548
Region 4 Southern Luzon 159,267
Region 5 Bicol Region 80,732
Region 6 Western Visayas 93,666
Region 7 Central Visayas 100,168
Region 8 Eastern Visayas 83,459
Region 9 Western Mindanao 76,805
Region 10 Northern Mindanao 89,592
Region 11 Southern Mindanao 97,505
Region 12 Socsargen 86,376
Region 13 Caraga 75,899
ARMM Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao 68,212

Table 3: Regional Poverty Incidence, by Family (in percent) 2003
    Poverty Incidence
(in percent)
Philippines   24.7
NCR National Capital Region 5.0
CAR Cordillera Autonomous Region 24.8
Region 1 Ilocos Region 24.4
Region 2 Cagayan Valley 19.3
Region 3 Central Luzon 13.7
Region 4-A Southern Tagalog - A 14.9
Region 4-B Southern Tagalog - B 39.7
Region 5 Bicol Region 40.5
Region 6 Western Visayas 31.3
Region 7 Central Visayas 23.7
Region 8 Eastern Visayas 35.5
Region 9 Zamboanga Peninsula 44.1
Region 10 Northern Mindanao 37.9
Region 11 Southern Mindanao 28.1
Region 12 Socsargen 32.0
Region 13 Caraga 47.3
ARMM Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao 45.7

In 2003, the poverty level in rural areas was higher at 36.3 percent compared with 12.7 percent in urban areas. Table 4 reveals a wide disparity of poverty incidence across the country. In Metro Manila, five percent of households live below the poverty line while Caraga has 47.3 percent of its households as poor.

In 2005, minimum wages were raised so the range now is from PhP170 to PhP300 a day depending on the region.

Table 4: Minimum Wage Rates (As of June 2005)
  Nominal Wage*
(for non-agricultural workers)
NCR 300.00
CAR 205.00
Region 1 200.00
Region 2 193.00
Region 3 243.00
Region 4-A 255.00
Region 4-B 196.00
Region 5 194.00
Region 6 190.00
Region 7 208.00
Region 8 195.00
Region 9 180.00
Region 10 202.00
Region 11 209.00
Region 12 200.00
Region 13 189.00
ARMM 170.00
*Highest Nominal Wage January-June 2005

As of 2004, unemployment remained high at 11 percent despite the 3.2 million jobs generated from 2001 to 2004. This indicates that the number of jobs generated had not been adequate to accommodate the influx of labor entrants. Moreover, underemployment seems to present a more serious problem at 17 percent in 2004.

Overseas employment has become the only option for many Filipinos seeking a decent life. A shortage of available jobs in the country has pushed an estimated seven million Filipinos to work overseas. Not only poor people are pushed into migration but also professionals seeking better opportunities. Since 2000, there has been a steady increase in the number of health professionals deciding to work abroad. The escalating migration of health professionals has serious implications to the country's health care system.

The increasing number of returning overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) who are HIV positive reveal that migrant workers are at great risk for HIV infection at various stages of the migration cycle. Studies have shown that low condom use, lack of access to information and health care services, inability to adapt to new environment, and difficult working conditions contribute to migrant workers' vulnerability to HIV and AIDS. The DOH reports that 33 percent of Filipinos infected with HIV are OFWs.

Literacy and Education

The Philippines continues to have a high simple literacy rate of 93.9 percent as of 2003, with only a slight difference between males and females; however, the functional literacy rate is only 85.1 percent. Literacy rates are higher in the urban areas, as people have more access to education compared with people in the rural areas. Metro Manila posts the highest literacy rate at 99.1 percent, while Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) has the lowest with only 70.7 percent.

Although literacy rates are high, completion rates in schools across the country are still low. The Department of Education reports that only 66.85 percent of those who begin elementary education actually get to finish it (elementary education in the Philippines has six grades). The situation is worse in ARMM where only 42.91 percent of those who begin Grade One actually get to finish Grade Six.

Survey results from the 2003 NDHS reveal that education is a notable variable in acquiring accurate knowledge about HIV transmission and prevention. Those who are better educated are more likely to have correct knowledge than those who are less educated. To illustrate, 44.3 percent of those who correctly rejected two most common misconceptions on HIV and AIDS have reached college while only 24.4 percent of those who reached elementary got the answers right. The number of years one stays in school is crucial in instilling HIV and AIDS prevention and education.

Source : Philippines 2005 HIV AIDS Country Profile HAIN PNAC UNAIDS Philippines

©2001-2007 Remedios AIDS Foundation, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.